Which type of evaluation assesses whether program activities are delivered as intended?

Which type of evaluation assesses whether program activities are delivered as intended?

• A. Outcome Evaluation
• B. Process Evaluation
• C. Impact Evaluation
• D. Economic Evaluation

Answer: (B)

Process evaluation asks whether the program activities are delivered as planned. It focuses on the implementation side—fidelity to the protocol, the intensity or dose of activities, the reach to the intended audience, and the quality of delivery. This type of evaluation is essential to confirm that any observed results (positive, negative, or null) can be attributed to the program itself rather than to how it was carried out. For example, if a health education program aims to run weekly sessions at five sites, process evaluation would check how many sessions actually occurred, who attended, and whether the curriculum was delivered as designed. In contrast, outcome evaluation looks at changes in participants as a result of the program, such as shifts in knowledge or behavior after the intervention. Impact evaluation goes further to assess broader or longer-term effects on the population. Economic evaluation analyzes costs and cost-effectiveness. Since the question asks about whether activities are delivered as intended, process evaluation is the best fit.

Process evaluation asks whether the program activities are delivered as planned. It focuses on the implementation side—fidelity to the protocol, the intensity or dose of activities, the reach to the intended audience, and the quality of delivery. This type of evaluation is essential to confirm that any observed results (positive, negative, or null) can be attributed to the program itself rather than to how it was carried out. For example, if a health education program aims to run weekly sessions at five sites, process evaluation would check how many sessions actually occurred, who attended, and whether the curriculum was delivered as designed.

In contrast, outcome evaluation looks at changes in participants as a result of the program, such as shifts in knowledge or behavior after the intervention. Impact evaluation goes further to assess broader or longer-term effects on the population. Economic evaluation analyzes costs and cost-effectiveness. Since the question asks about whether activities are delivered as intended, process evaluation is the best fit.